GENDER TENGLIK FENOMENINING TARIXIY-FALSAFIY EVOLYUTSIYASI:ANTIK DAVRDAN ZAMONAVIY TENDENSIYALARGACHA
Keywords:
Gender tenglik, fenomen, evolyutsiya, antik davr,O‘rta asrlar universitetlari, Sharq sivilizatsiyasi, dunyoviylik va diniylik muvozanati, ijtimoiy transformatsiya.Abstract
Ushbu maqolada gender tenglik fenomenining vujudga kelishi va rivojlanish bosqichlari tizimli tarixiy-falsafiy tahlil ostiga olingan. Maqola doirasida antik davr mutafakkirlarining gender munosabatlariga oid qarama-qarshi yondashuvlari, O‘rta asrlar G‘arb sivilizatsiyasida xotin-qizlar ta’limiga qo‘yilgan intellektual cheklovlar hamda jadidchilik harakatida diniy va dunyoviy qadriyatlar muvozanatining shakllanishi kabilar tahliliy o‘rganilgan.
References
1. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. – P. 106.
2.Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press. – P. 233.
3.Platon. Davlat / Rus tilidan Sh.Asadov tarjimasi. – Toshkent: "Yangi asr avlodi", 2019. – 480 b.
4. Aristotel. Siyosat (Politika) / Rus tilidan tarjima. – Toshkent: "O‘zbekiston", 2014 – 380 b.
5.Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: ClarendonPress. – P. 367. (Under the word "δάμαρ" from verb "δαμάζω").
6. Post, J. B. (1971). A Medieval Doctor’s Dispute and the Royal Prerogative: The Case of Jacqueline Félicie. Speculum, 46(1). – P. 143-145.
7. Fadel, M. (1997). Two Women, One Man: Knowledge, Power, and Gender in Medieval Sunni Legal Thought. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 29(2). – P. 185-204.
8. Кюри, Ева. Мария Кюри. Пер. с франц. — Москва: Молодая гвардия, 1968. - С. 245.
9. Kamp, Marianne. (2006). The New Woman in Uzbekistan: Islam, Modernity, and Unveiling under Communism. Seattle: University of Washington Press. – P. 186-187. (Chapter 7: Resistance and Violence during the Hujum)
