THE PHENOMENON OF ONTOLOGICAL GUILT, METAPHYSICAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DRAMATIC TENTION IN “I AM GUILTY” BY ALEKSANDR FAYNBERG

Authors

  • Odilova Charosxon Shavkatjon kizi Author

Keywords:

Keywords: ontological guilt, metaphysical responsibility, existentialism, collective accountability, ecological consciousness, theological paradox, historical trauma, moral consciousness, psychological interpretation, modern Uzbek poetry.

Abstract

Annotation: This article examines the phenomenon of ontological and metaphysical guilt in the poem “I Am Guilty” by Aleksandr Faynberg through philosophical and psychological frameworks. The study analyzes the lyrical subject’s confession of universal guilt as an expression of existential responsibility, ecological awareness, historical accountability, and theological paradox. Drawing upon the ideas of Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Karl Jaspers, Hannah Arendt, Sigmund Freud, and Viktor Frankl, the article interprets guilt not as a purely moral or legal category but as an ontological condition of human existence. The research demonstrates that the poem constructs a model of global responsibility in which individual innocence coexists with collective accountability. Philosophical and psychological interpretations are presented as complementary dimensions that reveal the depth of the poem’s ethical, existential, and metaphysical discourse.

References

1. Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Viking Press.

2. Augustine. (1991). Confessiones (Confessions). Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford University Press.

3. Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1946)

4. Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and Its Discontents. Translated by James Strachey. W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1930)

5. Glantz, M. H. (1999). Sustainable Development and the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge University Press.

6. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)

7. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper & Row. (Original work published 1954)

7. Hirsch, M. (2012). The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. Columbia University Press.

8. Jaspers, K. (2000). The Question of German Guilt. Translated by E. B. Ashton. Fordham University Press. (Original work published 1947)

9. Naess, A. (1973). “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement.” Inquiry, 16(1–4), 95–100.

10. Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Being and Nothingness. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. Routledge. (Original work published 1943)

11. Faynberg, A. (n.d.). I Am Guilty (poem).

Published

2026-02-22

How to Cite

Odilova Charosxon Shavkatjon kizi. (2026). THE PHENOMENON OF ONTOLOGICAL GUILT, METAPHYSICAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DRAMATIC TENTION IN “I AM GUILTY” BY ALEKSANDR FAYNBERG. JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS, 95(2), 12-27. http://journalss.org/index.php/new/article/view/19657