METHODOLOGY FOR USING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERACTIVE PLATFORMS IN TEACHING CHEMISTRY
Keywords:
Keywords: Digital technologies, interactive platforms, chemistry education, virtual laboratories, e-learning, blended learning, educational innovation, digital pedagogy, STEM education, assessment technologies.Abstract
Annotation: This article examines the methodological foundations for integrating digital technologies and interactive platforms into chemistry education. In the context of rapid digital transformation, modern chemistry teaching requires innovative approaches that enhance conceptual understanding, experimental skills, and learner engagement. The study analyzes theoretical perspectives on digital pedagogy, explores various interactive platforms used in chemistry instruction, and proposes a structured methodological model for effective implementation. The research employs qualitative analysis of existing literature and comparative evaluation of digital tools in educational practice. The results indicate that digital technologies significantly improve visualization of abstract chemical processes, promote collaborative learning, and support differentiated instruction.
References
1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
3. European Commission. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
4. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.
5. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
6. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
8. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.
11. Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.
12. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.
13. Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683.
