LINGVOKULTUROLOGIYA VA DISKURS TAHLILINING NAZARIY ASOSLARI
Keywords:
Kalit so‘zlar: lingvokulturologiya, diskurs tahlili, til va madaniyat, konsept, frazeologizm, madaniy xotira, antropotsentrik lingvistika, nemis jamiyati, Kindeswohl, Familienpolitik.Abstract
Annotatsiya: Maqolada til va madaniyat o‘zaro aloqalarini o‘rganuvchi lingvokulturologiya hamda nutqni ijtimoiy-madaniy kontekstdan tahlil qiluvchi diskurs tahlilining nazariy asoslari yoritilgan. Unda “lingvokulturologiya” va “diskurs” tushunchalarining shakllanishi, ularning zamonaviy lingvistikadagi o‘rni va integratsiyasi tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda lingvokulturologik va diskursiv yondashuvlar asosida tilning madaniyat ko‘zgusi sifatidagi roli, milliy qadriyatlarning frazeologik birliklar hamda metaforalarda aks etishi ilmiy asosda ko‘rsatib berilgan. Nemis tilidagi Kindeswohl, Familienpolitik, Elternzeit, kinderfreundlich kabi birliklar misolida “bola – kelajak” konseptining madaniy semantikasi ochib berilgan.
References
1. Humboldt W. von. On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. – 314 p.
2. Sapir E. The Status of Linguistics as a Science // Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality / Ed. by D. G. Mandelbaum. – Berkeley: University of California Press, 1949. – P. 160–166.
3. Whorf B. L. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf / Ed. by J. B. Carroll. – Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1956. – 278 p.
4. Telija V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya: semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekty. – Moskva: Yazyki russkoy kultury, 1996. – 284 s.
5. Maslova V. A. Lingvokulturologiya. – Moskva: Akademiya, 2001. – 208 s.
6. Krasnykh V. V. Etnopsikholingvistika i lingvokulturologiya: kurs lektsiy. – Moskva: Gnozis, 2002. – 250 s.
7. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs. – Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. – 390 s.
8. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992. – 259 p.
9. van Dijk T. A. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. – 279 p.
10. Wodak R.; Meyer M. (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. – Los Angeles: Sage, 2015. – 340 p.
11. Jäger S. Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung. – Duisburg: DISS, 2012. – 156 s.
12. Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. – 368 p.
13. Bartmiński J. Aspects of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. – London: Equinox, 2009. – 258 p.
14. Assmann J. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. – 304 p.
15. Busse D. Frame-Semantik: Ein Kompendium. – Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012. – 412 s.
16. Ziem A. Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse: Theoretical Foundations and Descriptive Applications. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. – 305 p.
17. Görgen A.; Söhner F.; Fangerau H. Kindeswohl als kollektives Orientierungsmuster? – Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. – Bd. 64. – Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 2018. – P. 40–53.
18. https://www.academia.edu/21725734/_Concept_in_Modern_Linguistics_the_Component_of_the_Concept_Good_
