SUT BEZI RAKI DIAGNOSTIKASIDA ULTRATOVUSH TEKSHIRUVINING (UZI) O'RNI VA AHAMIYATI
Keywords:
Kalit so'zlar: sut bezi raki, ultratovush tekshiruvi (UZI), BI-RADS, elastografiya, rangli doppler, mammografiya, diagnostika.Abstract
Sut bezi raki (SBR) bugungi kunda dunyo bo'ylab ayollar o'rtasida eng ko'p tarqalgan onkologik kasallik bo'lib, o'lim ko'rsatkichlari jihatidan ham yuqori o'rinlardan birini egallaydi. Ushbu kasallikni erta bosqichda aniqlash bemorlarning hayot sifatini va sog'ayish ehtimolini sezilarli darajada oshiradi. Ultratovush tekshiruvi (UZI) — zamonaviy tibbiyotda sut bezlarini tekshirishning asosiy va keng qo'llaniladigan usullaridan biri sifatida tan olingan bo'lib, u nurlanishsiz, arzon va real vaqt rejimida tasvirga olish imkoniyatini beradi. Ushbu maqolada biz klinik amaliyotda UZIning sut bezi raki diagnostikasidagi sezgirligi, o'ziga xosligi, BI-RADS tizimlashtirishidagi roli, elastografiya va rangli doppler texnologiyalari bilan kombinatsiyasi hamda mammografiya bilan solishtirma samaradorligi muhokama etiladi. Tadqiqot natijalarimiz UZIning sut bezi tekshiruvida mustaqil va qo'shimcha diagnostik vosita sifatidagi o'rnini tasdiqlaydi va klinik amaliyot uchun amaliy ahamiyat kasb etadi.
References
1. Khalid A, Mukhtar MA, Mukhtar A, Mukhtar R. High-Resolution Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Clinical Implications. Cureus. 2025;88641. doi:10.7759/cureus.88641 [PMC12375396]
2. Zhang YN, Wang CJ, Xu Y, et al. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of axillary ultrasound in breast cancer metastasis to the axillary lymph nodes in Chinese patients. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(7):1835-1841. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.024 [PubMed 25933712]
3. Systematic review: Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) vs contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). PMC10803446. 2024. [A total of 16 studies, 4115 participants; ABUS sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.93, AUC 0.96]
4. Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Zaat JO, Koomen AR, Willebrand D. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997;76(3):377-381. [PMC2224070]
5. Adesina A et al. The comparative accuracy of ultrasound and mammography in the detection of breast cancer. PubMed 25241817. 2014. [USG sensitivity 82%, MMG sensitivity 49%]
6. CAD system for breast cancer diagnosis via ultrasound. PMC10582378. 2023. [CAD specificity 92.71%, AUC 0.9450 vs conventional US 0.7940]
7. Lin M, Wu S, Garzali IU. Ultrasound classification of non-mass breast lesions following BI-RADS presents high positive predictive value. PLOS ONE. 2022. PMC9710769.
8. Stratifying Breast Lesion Risk Using BI-RADS: A Correlative Study of Imaging and Histopathology. PMC12299629. 2025. [67 women, mean age 56.4]
9. Glechner A et al. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening. Cochrane Library. 2023. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3
10. Diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer: a systematic review. PMC10247623. 2023. [PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE 2008-2021 qidiruvi]
11. Zhou J, Zhang Y, Shi S. Ultrasound elastography: advances and challenges in early detection of breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2025. PMC12241035.
12. Prabakaran L, Aiyappan SK, Ramesh S et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Spectral Doppler Indices and Sonoelastography in BI-RADS 3 Breast Lesions. Cureus. 2024. PMC11638018.
13. Controlled study of traditional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography on the diagnosis of breast masses. PubMed 26656989. [UE: sens 98.7%, spec 90.2%; CUS: sens 93.6%, spec 76.1%]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonoelastography for Breast Lesions: A Meta-Analysis. PMC12295543. 2025. [Strain and Shear Wave elastography comparison]
15. Incorporating BI-RADS Lexicon with a Fully Convolutional Network for Malignancy Detection on Breast Ultrasound. PMC8774546. 2022. [AUC 89.47%]
16. Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer vs Fibroadenoma. PubMed 29424448. 2018.
17. Breast Tumour Classification Using Ultrasound Elastography with Machine Learning: Systematic Scoping Review. PMC8773731. 2022.
18. Diagnostic value of ultrasound radiomic features in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. PMC12496310. 2025. [GE LOGIQ E20 apparati, BI-RADS 2-5]
19. Comparative study of mammography and breast ultrasound in young women (≤45): A meta-analysis. ScienceDirect. 2025. [US preferred initial imaging in dense breasts]
20. Predicting BI-RADS Classification of Palpable Breast Masses Using Ultrasound. PMC12861517. Lampang Hospital, Thailand. 2021-2023. [390 patients retrospective study]
