BUYRAK TOSH KASALLIGIDA KOMPYUTER TOMOGRAFIYANING DIAGNOSTIK AHAMIYATI

Authors

  • Xamidova Mohinur Abrayevna Author
  • Soataliyeva Ruxshona Sotvoldi qizi Author

Keywords:

Kalit so'zlar: buyrak tosh kasalligi, kompyuter tomografiya, NCCT, diagnostika, urolithiasis, Hounsfield birliklari, DECT

Abstract

Buyrak tosh kasalligi (nephrolithiasis, urolithiasis) — global miqyosda keng tarqalgan urologik patologiyalardan biri bo'lib, kasallarning hayot sifatini keskin pasaytiradi hamda sog'liqni saqlash tizimiga jiddiy moliyaviy yuk tug'diradi. So'nggi o'n yilliklarda bu kasallikning tarqalish ko'rsatkichi dunyo bo'ylab sezilarli darajada oshib bormoqda. Ushbu maqolada kompyuter tomografiyasining (KT) — xususan, kontrastsiz KT (NCCT) ning — buyrak tosh kasalligini aniqlashdagi diagnostik samaradorligi keng ko'rib chiqiladi.

Ushbu retrospektiv tadqiqotda 2020–2024 yillar oralig'ida klinikaga bellarda keskin og'riq (pochechnaiya kolika) shikoyati bilan murojaat qilgan 250 nafar bemor ma'lumotlari tahlil qilindi. Bemorlar yoshi, jinsi, tosh o'lchami, o'rni, Hounsfield birliklari (HU), obstruksiya darajasi va muqobil patologiyalarning aniqlash imkoniyatlari bo'yicha taqqoslama tadqiqot o'tkazildi. Natijalar shuni ko'rsatdiki, NCCT usulining sezuvchanligi 96,4%, o'ziga xosligi esa 97,8% ni tashkil etdi — bu ko'rsatkichlar ultratovush (USG) va oddiy rentgen tekshiruvlariga qaraganda ancha yuqori. Hounsfield birliklari asosida toshlarning tarkibi (kalsiy oksalat, siyd kislotasi, struvit va boshqalar) haqida oldindan ma'lumot olish imkoni aniqlandi. Dual-energy KT (DECT) texnologiyasi esa tosh tarkibini belgilashda yanada aniqroq natija berishini tasdiqlaydi. KT ning keng diagnostik imkoniyatlari, tezkorligi va yuqori aniqligi uni buyrak tosh kasalligini diagnoz qo'yish hamda davolash taktikasini belgilashda oltin standart sifatida mustahkamlaydi.

References

ADABIYOTLAR (REFERENCES

1. Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2015;31(3):179-184. PMC4495492. [PubMed]

2. Aljawad M, Alaithan FA, Bukhamsin BS, Alawami AA. Assessing the Diagnostic Performance of CT in Suspected Urinary Stones: A Retrospective Analysis. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37699. doi:10.7759/cureus.37699. PMID: 37192492. [PubMed]

3. American Urological Association. Clinical Effectiveness Protocols for Imaging in The Management of Ureteral Calculous Disease: AUA Technology Assessment. AUA; 2023. Available: auanet.org.

4. Combining Mean and Standard Deviation of Hounsfield Unit Measurements from Preoperative CT Allows More Accurate Prediction of Urinary Stone Composition. PubMed. 2015. PMID: 26597058. [PubMed]

5. Comparison between ultrasound and noncontrast helical computed tomography for identification of acute ureterolithiasis in a teaching hospital setting. PMC11014692. 2024. [PMC]

6. Daudon M, Frochot V, Bazin D, Jungers P. Drug-Induced Kidney Stones and Crystalline Nephropathy: Pathophysiology, Prevention and Treatment. Drugs. 2018;78(2):163-201. [PubMed]

7. Emergency department non-contrast computed tomography for suspicion of obstructive urolithiasis: Yield and consequences. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;16(7):E365-E370. PMC9328852. [PubMed]

8. Epidemiological trends of urolithiasis in working-age populations: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2021. PMC12212516. 2025. [PMC]

9. Euler A, Wullschleger S, Sartoretti T, et al. Dual-energy CT kidney stone characterization — can diagnostic accuracy be achieved at low radiation dose? Eur Radiol. 2023;33(8):5700-5710. doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09569-1. [PubMed]

10. Haji O, Gronczewska LP, Nunow M, et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Reduced-Dose CT of the Kidneys, Ureters, and Bladder in the Evaluation of Renal Colic. Cureus. 2025. PMC12703392. [PubMed]

11. Hussain M, Alawadi A, Smith Y, et al. The Predictive Accuracy of Hounsfield Units and Urinary pH in the Non-invasive Diagnosis of Radiolucent Urinary Stones. Cureus. 2025. PMC12508783. [PubMed]

12. Implementation of a Technique Based on Hounsfield Units and Hounsfield Density to Determine Kidney Stone Composition. Tomography. 2021;7(4):606-613. doi:10.3390/tomography7040051. PMC8544724. [PubMed]

13. Kim YI, Song SH, Park J, et al. Deep-Learning Segmentation of Urinary Stones in Noncontrast Computed Tomography. J Endourol. 2023;37(5):595-606. doi:10.1089/end.2022.0722. PMID: 36924291. [PubMed]

14. McCoombe K, Dobeli K, Meikle S, Llewellyn S, Kench P. Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(12):8295-8305. doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5. [PubMed]

15. Retrospective Evaluation of the STONE Score and Modified Stone Score for Prediction of Renal Tract Stones. PubMed. 2025. PMID: 41968395. [PubMed]

16. Role of non-contrast spiral computerized tomography in acute ureteric colic. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(2):107-111. PMC2721517. [PubMed/PMC]

17. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: A global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12(2-3):e86-e96. PMC2931286. [PubMed]

18. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):160-165. [PubMed]

19. Scales CD Jr, Tasian GE, Schwaderer AL, et al. Urinary Epidemiology and Kidney Stone Prevention. J Urol. 2023. Epidemiology of Kidney Stones. Healthcare 2023;11(3):424. PMC9914194. [PubMed]

20. The comparative survey of Hounsfield units of stone composition in urolithiasis patients. Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:148. PMC4214025. [PubMed]

21. Value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the diagnosis of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PMC10552745. 2023. [PubMed]

Published

2026-05-10

How to Cite

Xamidova Mohinur Abrayevna, & Soataliyeva Ruxshona Sotvoldi qizi. (2026). BUYRAK TOSH KASALLIGIDA KOMPYUTER TOMOGRAFIYANING DIAGNOSTIK AHAMIYATI. JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS, 100(2), 237-246. https://journalss.org/index.php/new/article/view/29047