DEVELOPING STUDENT’S ABILITY TO HOLD A DISCOURSE THROUGH DIALOGUES
Keywords:
Keywords: discourse, communication, interactional mechanic , discursive ability, communicative competence, pedagogical technology, students, language teaching methodology.Abstract
Abstract: The importance of dialogue in forming students' communication cultures and its critical role in the development of their discursive skills are examined in this essay. Effective strategies for improving abilities including logical reasoning processes, understanding the viewpoints of others, and responding appropriately to others during communication are examined in this study. The report also provides useful advice on how to use contemporary pedagogical technology to improve students' overall discursive ability and prepare them for spontaneous conversation. The results highlight how important deliberate dialogic practices are for improving students' critical thinking, communication, and teamwork skills. This study adds to the continuing conversation on effective teaching methods for fostering students' ability to have fruitful conversations, enabling them to take an active role in their education and in larger social interactions.This study adds to the continuing conversation on effective teaching methods for fostering students' ability to have fruitful conversations, enabling them to take an active role in their education and in larger social interactions. For two main reasons, discourse skills—which include both competent speaking and listening—are essential to a successful education. Students can clarify their opinions, hear other people's viewpoints, and work through difficult ideas through conversations and debates.
References
1.Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press. P.190
2.Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4. The history of the development of the higher mental functions. New York: Plenum Press
3. Russell, D. W. (2002). In Search of Underlying Dimensions: The Use (and Abuse) of Factor Analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629-1646.
4.Northedge, A. (2003). Enabling Participation in Academic Discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052429
5.Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. Penguin. p.60-125
6..Jalolov, J. J. (2012). Chet til o‘qitish metodikasi (Foreign Language Teaching Methodology). Toshkent: O‘qituvchi.
7.Passov, E. I. (1991). The Communicative Method of Teaching Foreign Language Speaking.
8.Yusupov, U. K. (2007). Theoretical Problems of Contrastive Linguistics. Toshkent: Fan.
9.Nunan, D. Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: McGraw-Hill. 2003. p. 49
10.Celce- Murica, M. & Olshtain, E. Discourse and context in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000
11.Richards, J. C. ‘’Listening comprehension: approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly”- Volume 17/2:1983, 224.
12..Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge, Polity. Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: the critical study of language, London, Longman.
13.Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. Kress, G. (1990) 'Critical discourse analysis', Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, pp84-99.
14.Widdowson, H. (1995a) 'Review of N. Fairclough “Discourse and Social Change”', Applied Linguistics, 16, 4, pp510-16.
15.Widdowson, H. (1995b) 'Discourse analysis: a critical view', Language and Literature, 4, 3, pp157-7
16. Pérez Martín, M. C. (1996): “Linguistic and communicative competence”. In McLaren, N. & Madrid, D. A Handbook for TEFL. Alcoy: Marfil.
17. Canale, M. (1983): “From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy”. In Richards, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (ed.): Language and Communication. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
18.Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980): “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing”. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
19. Bachman, L. F. (1990): Fundamental considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Bachman, L. F., and Palmer, A. S. (1996): Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
