“THE ROLE AND CHALLENGES OF ANALYTICAL THINKING IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A LITERATURE-BASED ANALYSIS”
Keywords:
analytical thinking, PEEL technique, CER method, academic writing, critical evaluation, argument development, background knowledge, essay structureAbstract
This article investigates the challenges students face in academic
writing despite possessing strong English language skills, focusing on the critical role
of analytical thinking. It identifies causes of failure in essay writing, including lack of
confidence, limited critical evaluation of sources, insufficient background knowledge,
and weak argument development. The study emphasizes strategies to overcome these
difficulties by employing structured writing methods such as the PEEL (Point
Evidence-Explanation-Link) and CER (Claim-Evidence-Reasoning) techniques.
Experiments designed to evaluate the efficacy of these methods demonstrate that both
PEEL and CER improve clarity, organization, critical thinking, and the overall quality
of student essays. The findings suggest that implementing these structured approaches
can significantly enhance the academic writing process and strengthen students’
analytical thinking skills.
References
1. Engineering Thesis Handbook. (2025). Guidelines and Rubrics for Thesis
Evaluation. University Academic Press.
2. Gardner, S. (2023). How to Structure Paragraphs Using the PEEL Method.
Studiosity Blog. Retrieved from https://www.studiosity.com/blog/how-to-structure
paragraphs-using-the-peel-method
3. Gibbons, S. (2019). Death by PEEL: Structuring Paragraphs for Academic Success.
Virtual
Library
Educational
Guide.
Retrieved
from
https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/101863980/_Death_by_PEEL_GIBBONS_Acce
pted1September2018_GREEN_AAM.pdf
4. Hodder Science. (n.d.). Writing Scientifically with CER. Retrieved from
https://www.hodderscience.com/tondrykcom/tondryk/Bio_H___BIO_files/1
%20Writing%20Scientifically%20-%20C.E.R..pdf
5. McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and Scientific Explanations: Helping
Students Use Evidence and Reasoning. Science Education Research Chapter.
6. Mizrahi, R. (2013). Understanding Weak Arguments in Academic Writing.
Academic Review Press.
7. Newcastle University Academic Skills Kit. (n.d.). Paragraphing: PEEL Model.
Retrieved
from
https://www.ncl.ac.uk/academic-skills-kit/writing/academic
writing/paragraphing/
8. ResearchGate. (n.d.). Using the Claim-Evidence-Reasoning Strategy in Scientific
Explanation
and
Argumentative
Writing
Skills.
Retrieved
from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392825153_Using_of_claim_evidence_and
_reasoning_strategy_in_scientific_explanation_and_argumentative_writing_skills_of
_grade_nine_chemistry_students
9. Setyorini, D., & Hawa, S. (2024). Challenges in Academic Writing: Analytical
Thinking and Essay Performance. Journal of English Language Learning, 8, 709-720.
10. Staffordshire University Academic Writing Resources. (2025). PEEL Paragraphs
Guide. Retrieved from https://libguides.staffs.ac.uk/academic_writing/PEEL