“THE ROLE AND CHALLENGES OF ANALYTICAL THINKING IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A LITERATURE-BASED ANALYSIS”

Authors

  • Rajabboyeva Marjona O’rinboy qizi Author
  • Sobirova Feruza Islomjon qizi Author

Keywords:

analytical thinking, PEEL technique, CER method, academic writing, critical evaluation, argument development, background knowledge, essay structure

Abstract

This article investigates the challenges students face in academic 
writing despite possessing strong English language skills, focusing on the critical role 
of analytical thinking. It identifies causes of failure in essay writing, including lack of 
confidence, limited critical evaluation of sources, insufficient background knowledge, 
and weak argument development. The study emphasizes strategies to overcome these 
difficulties by employing structured writing methods such as the PEEL (Point
Evidence-Explanation-Link) and CER (Claim-Evidence-Reasoning) techniques. 
Experiments designed to evaluate the efficacy of these methods demonstrate that both 
PEEL and CER improve clarity, organization, critical thinking, and the overall quality 
of student essays. The findings suggest that implementing these structured approaches 
can significantly enhance the academic writing process and strengthen students’ 
analytical thinking skills.

References

1. Engineering Thesis Handbook. (2025). Guidelines and Rubrics for Thesis

Evaluation. University Academic Press.

2. Gardner, S. (2023). How to Structure Paragraphs Using the PEEL Method.

Studiosity Blog. Retrieved from https://www.studiosity.com/blog/how-to-structure

paragraphs-using-the-peel-method

3. Gibbons, S. (2019). Death by PEEL: Structuring Paragraphs for Academic Success.

Virtual

Library

Educational

Guide.

Retrieved

from

https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/101863980/_Death_by_PEEL_GIBBONS_Acce

pted1September2018_GREEN_AAM.pdf

4. Hodder Science. (n.d.). Writing Scientifically with CER. Retrieved from

https://www.hodderscience.com/tondrykcom/tondryk/Bio_H___BIO_files/1

%20Writing%20Scientifically%20-%20C.E.R..pdf

5. McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and Scientific Explanations: Helping

Students Use Evidence and Reasoning. Science Education Research Chapter.

6. Mizrahi, R. (2013). Understanding Weak Arguments in Academic Writing.

Academic Review Press.

7. Newcastle University Academic Skills Kit. (n.d.). Paragraphing: PEEL Model.

Retrieved

from

https://www.ncl.ac.uk/academic-skills-kit/writing/academic

writing/paragraphing/

8. ResearchGate. (n.d.). Using the Claim-Evidence-Reasoning Strategy in Scientific

Explanation

and

Argumentative

Writing

Skills.

Retrieved

from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392825153_Using_of_claim_evidence_and

_reasoning_strategy_in_scientific_explanation_and_argumentative_writing_skills_of

_grade_nine_chemistry_students

9. Setyorini, D., & Hawa, S. (2024). Challenges in Academic Writing: Analytical

Thinking and Essay Performance. Journal of English Language Learning, 8, 709-720.

10. Staffordshire University Academic Writing Resources. (2025). PEEL Paragraphs

Guide. Retrieved from https://libguides.staffs.ac.uk/academic_writing/PEEL

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

“THE ROLE AND CHALLENGES OF ANALYTICAL THINKING IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A LITERATURE-BASED ANALYSIS”. (2025). ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 83(4), 120-127. https://journalss.org/index.php/obr/article/view/10702