DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF EMERGENCY LAPAROSCOPY IN ACUTE ABDOMINAL DISEASES WITH
Keywords:
To evaluate the diagnostic capabilities and clinical effectiveness of emergency laparoscopy in patients with an unclear clinical presentation of acute abdominal diseases in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and optimize surgical management.Abstract
Acute diseases of the abdominal organs remain one of the most
common causes of emergency hospitalization and urgent surgical interventions. A
significant clinical challenge is represented by patients with an unclear or atypical
clinical presentation, in whom conventional diagnostic methods—clinical
examination, laboratory tests, ultrasonography, and computed tomography—do not
always allow timely establishment of an accurate diagnosis and determination of
optimal treatment strategy. Diagnostic errors and delayed verification of the disease
often lead to progression of the pathological process, development of complications,
and deterioration of treatment outcomes. Under these conditions, emergency
laparoscopy acquires particular importance as a highly informative and minimally
invasive method that enables direct visualization of the abdominal organs, clarification
of the nature and extent of pathological changes, and, in many cases, immediate
transition from diagnosis to treatment. The use of laparoscopy contributes to a
reduction in the number of unjustified laparotomies, shorter hospital stays, and a lower
incidence of postoperative complications.
References
1.
Bucher P. Transumbiblcal single-port laparoscopic repair of perforated
gasrtoduodenal ulcer / P. Bucher [et al.] // Surg. Endosc. - 2010. - Vol. 24, № 1. - P.
82.283
2.
Corcione F., Cuccurullo D., Pirozzi F., et al. The Role of Laparoscopy in
Emergency Treatment of Complications after Laparoscopic and Endoscopic
Procedures // The Role of Laparoscopy in Emergency Abdominal Surgery / ed. V.
Mandala. – Italia: Springer-Verlag, 2012. – P. 175–189. – (Updates in Surgery).
3.
Chow, A. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an
evolving technique / A. Chow, S. Purkayastha, O. Aziz, P. Paraskeva // Surg. Endosc.
— 2010. — № 24 (3). — P. 709 -714.
4.
Keus F, et al. Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on
small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick
leave
outweighs efforts in hospital savings; 2009. Available from:
http://www.trialsjoumal.eom/content/10/l/80
5.
Miyano G., Okazaki T., Kato Y. et al. Open versus laparoscopic treatment
for pan-peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective
analysis // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2010. Vol. 20, № 7. P. 655–657.
6.
Pucher PH, Carter NC, Knight BC, Toh S, Tucker V, Mercer SJ. Impact
of laparoscopic approach in emergency major abdominal surgery: single-centre
analysis of 748 consecutive cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(4):279-284.
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0229
7.
Shamiyeh A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late
complications and their treatment /A. Shamiyeh, W. Wayand// Langenbeck's Archives
of Surgery. - 2004. - t. 389. №3. - p. 164-171
