COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN SURGERY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

Authors

  • Alijonov Abdug'affor Abdulaziz ogli Author

Keywords:

acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, complications, rehabilitation.

Abstract

 Acute cholecystitis is a rapidly developing inflammatory disease of the 
gallbladder, and surgical treatment is the main method. This article discusses the 
clinical and practical comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy methods 
used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic surgery is characterized by 
minimal invasiveness, low postoperative pain, short hospital stay, and rapid 
rehabilitation. Open surgery is preferred in complex, complicated, or late-detected 
cases. The article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of both methods, the 
duration of the operation, the risk of complications, and the impact on the patient's 
quality of life. The importance of an individual approach in modern surgical practice, 
depending on the patient's general condition and the severity of the disease, is 
substantiated.

References

1. Freeman M. L. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: A review.

//Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1997, 45(3), 215— 225.

2. Buxbaum J., Abbas Fehmi S., Sultan S. et al. ASGE guideline on the role of

endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. //Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

2019, 89(6), 1075-1105.

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN SURGERY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS. (2026). ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 87(2), 256-260. https://journalss.org/index.php/obr/article/view/18983