SPECIFICITY OF MICROFLORA IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES AND MATERIALS OF DENTAL PROSTHESES

Authors

  • Pulatova Raykhon Saidumarovna Author
  • Rayimov Alisher Tulkin ugli Author

Keywords:

dental prostheses, oral microflora, surface roughness, zirconia, titanium, Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans, peri-implantitis, biofilm diversity, prosthetic materials.

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between dental prosthesis 
materials and the composition of oral microflora among 80 adult patients using 
different prosthesis types: removable acrylic, fixed metal-ceramic, zirconia-based, and 
titanium implant-supported restorations. Standardized clinical examinations, 
microbiological cultures, and quantitative PCR analyses were performed to assess 
microbial diversity, load, and surface characteristics. The results showed that acrylic 
resin dentures harbored the highest microbial load (45.6×10^5 CFU/mL) dominated by 
Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans, while zirconia and titanium prostheses 
exhibited reduced biofilm formation and higher microbial diversity (Shannon index 
2.10). Surface roughness strongly correlated with total microbial load (r=0.89). These 
findings underscore that smoother materials such as zirconia and titanium minimize 
microbial accumulation, reducing the risk of denture stomatitis, secondary caries, and 
peri-implant inflammation. Clinically, the study highlights the importance of material 
selection, finishing protocols, and individualized hygiene programs to enhance 
prosthesis longevity and oral health outcomes.

References

1.

Kang H., et al. Influence of dental material on biofilm formation and microbial

diversity. J Prosthodont Res., 2020.

2.

Silva L.F., et al. Microbial adhesion to different prosthodontic materials: a

comparative study. Clin Oral Investig., 2022.

3.

Nakamura S., et al. Surface roughness and bacterial colonization on dental

prostheses. Dent Mater J., 2021.

4.

Martins V.M., et al. Fungal biofilm development on acrylic denture bases:

prevention and control. Mycopathologia., 2020.

5.

Sailer I., et al. Ceramic materials in prosthodontics: performance and biological

interaction. Int J Prosthodont., 2021.

6.

Pereira-Cenci T., et al. Denture stomatitis and Candida colonization: impact of

hygiene protocols. Gerodontology., 2023.

7.

Rocha E.P., et al. Comparison of titanium and zirconia abutments in peri

implant microbiota composition. Clin Oral Implants Res., 2021.

8.

Alrabiah M., et al. The role of material characteristics in peri-implant

microbiome shifts. J Periodontol., 2022.

9.

Khoury F., et al. Microbiological evaluation of fixed dental prostheses:

material-dependent biofilm changes. Clin Oral Investig., 2020.

10.

Zhang J., et al. The correlation between surface topography and oral bacterial

adhesion. BMC Oral Health., 2023.

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

SPECIFICITY OF MICROFLORA IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES AND MATERIALS OF DENTAL PROSTHESES. (2025). ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 79(1), 278-290. https://journalss.org/index.php/obr/article/view/2515