PRAGMATIC AND CROSS-CULTURAL TYPOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPEECH ACTS AND POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN ENGLISH, UZBEK,AND RUSSIAN

Authors

  • Ismoilova Nasiba Odiljon qizi Author
  • Xatira Gaybullayeva Muratdjanovna Author

Keywords:

Pragmatics, cross-cultural communication, politeness, speech acts, English, Uzbek, Russian, directness, address forms, apology strategies.

Abstract

This research explores the pragmatic and cross-cultural aspects of communication 
by comparing speech acts and politeness strategies in English, Uzbek, and Russian. 
The study focuses on five key areas: (1) forms of address, (2) etiquette expressions, (3) 
apology strategies, (4) complimenting and criticizing patterns, and (5) direct and 
indirect speech acts. Through discourse analysis and questionnaire-based data 
collection, the study aims to identify cultural norms and pragmatic tendencies that 
shape interpersonal communication in each language. The findings highlight how 
linguistic politeness reflects cultural values such as individualism and collectivism, 
respect for hierarchy, and degrees of formality. This comparative typology contributes 
to understanding intercultural pragmatics and enhances communicative competence in 
multilingual and multicultural contexts.  

References

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

2. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Yuldasheva, F. E. (2022). The Principle of Politeness in the English and Uzbek

Languages. Eurasian Research Bulletin, 6, 65–70.

4. Kholboyeva, F. K. Q. (2025). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics of Compliments and

Apologies in English and Uzbek Communication. Modern American Journal of

Linguistics, Education, and Pedagogy, 1(7), 158–164.

Published

2025-11-17

How to Cite

PRAGMATIC AND CROSS-CULTURAL TYPOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPEECH ACTS AND POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN ENGLISH, UZBEK,AND RUSSIAN. (2025). ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 81(3), 94-97. https://journalss.org/index.php/obr/article/view/5599