COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSICAL AND AGILITY PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES
Keywords:
Keywords: project management, Waterfall methodology, Agile, Scrum, Kanban, hybrid approaches, project team, project effectiveness, adaptation to change.Abstract
Abstract: Our article provides a comparative analysis of classic and agile project
management methodologies. We examine the key principles, features, advantages, and
disadvantages of each methodology. Particular attention is paid to practical aspects of
application, including choosing the appropriate methodology based on the nature of the
project, the stability of requirements, and the characteristics of the team.
References
References:
1. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 7th Edition, 2021.
2. Royce, W. W. “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems,”
Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, 1970.
3. Sommerville, I. Software Engineering, 10th Edition, Pearson, 2015.
4. Beck, K. et al. Manifesto for Agile Software Development, 2001.
5. Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. The Scrum Guide, 2020.
6. Highsmith, J. Adaptive Software Development, Addison-Wesley, 2000.
7. Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M.
“Agile Project Management and Stage-Gate Hybrid Models in Product
Development,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2016, Vol.
40, pp. 1–16.
8. Kerzner, H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling,
and Controlling, 12th Edition, Wiley, 2017.
9. Cohn, M. Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum, Addison-
Wesley, 2009.
10. PMI. The Standard for Project Management and Organizational Governance, 2020.
