EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENTIAL TEACHING METHODS AND MIXED LEVEL CLASSES

Authors

  • Xaydarova Shoira Author
  • Berdimurodova Dildora Qaxramon qizi Author

Keywords:

Key words: Differentiated instruction, Mixed-level classrooms, Learner diversity, Learner diversity, Individual differences, Flexible grouping, Inclusive education, Student engagement, Educational effectiveness

Abstract

Annotation: This article examines the effectiveness  of differentiated teaching 
methods  in  mixed  level  classrooms,where  students  demonstrate  varying 
abilities,learning styles,and academic needs.The study highlights how differentiated 
instruction  through  flexible  grouping,  varieted  task,adaptive  materials,and  learner-
centered  strategies  —can  enhance  student  engagement,  motivation,  and  academic 
achievement. Special attention is given to the role of teachers in identifying individual 
differences  and  designing  inclusive  learning  environments  that  support  both  high-
achieving and struggling learners. The findings suggest that differentiated teaching 
methods  contribute  to  more  equitable  learning  outcomes,  improved  classroom 
interaction, and the development of learners’ autonomy. The article concludes that, 
despite certain challenges such as increased planning time and classroom management 
demands,  differentiated  instruction  remains  an  effective  approach  for  addressing 
diversity in mixed-level classes.   

References

REFERENCES

1. Aliakbari, M., & Haghighi, J. (2014). On the effectiveness of differentiated

instruction in the enhancement of Iranian learners reading comprehension in

separate gender education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 182-189.

2. Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal

of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 152. Ariss, L. D. (2017).

3. Differentiated instruction: An exploratory study in a secondary mathematics

classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Toledo. Anderson, L

4. .W., Krathwohl, D. R., (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing:

a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY:

5. Longmans. Anstee, P. (2014). Differentiation pocketbook. Teacher’s Pocketbooks.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Michigan:

6. Longmans, Green and Co. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Play and early

literacy: A Vygotskian approach. In K. A. Roskos, & J. F. Christie (Eds.), Play and

literacy in early childhood: Research from multiple perspectives (pp.185-200).

7. Taylor and Francis. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning,

conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Published

2026-01-08

How to Cite

Xaydarova Shoira, & Berdimurodova Dildora Qaxramon qizi. (2026). EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENTIAL TEACHING METHODS AND MIXED LEVEL CLASSES . TADQIQOTLAR, 77(3), 323-325. https://journalss.org/index.php/tad/article/view/14198