COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES IN INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Gulmira Usmonova Author
  • Madina Abjaparova Author
  • Ruxshona Valiyeva Author

Keywords:

Keywords: Morphology, Indo-European languages, inflection, derivation, typology, historical linguistics, fusional language, case system, verb conjugation, comparative grammar.

Abstract

 
Abstract 
This study presents a comparative analysis of morphological structures within 
selected Indo-European languages, focusing on the typological diversity and historical 
development  of  inflectional  and  derivational  morphology.  The  Indo-European 
language family, which includes English, Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, Russian, and others, 
demonstrates  both  shared  grammatical  roots  and  unique  evolutionary  paths.  By 
analyzing morphological features such as case marking, verb conjugation, and nominal 
declension, this research identifies patterns of retention, innovation, and simplification 
across  branches.  Special  attention  is  given  to  how  morphological  systems  reflect 
broader  syntactic  and  phonological  changes  over  time.  The  study  employs  a 
comparative-historical method, drawing on linguistic data from classical and modern 
sources to examine both fusional and analytical tendencies within the family. Results 
show that morphological complexity correlates with historical linguistic change and 
language  contact,  influencing  how  modern  Indo-European  languages  express 
grammatical  relations.  This  analysis  contributes  to  understanding  the  evolution  of 
morphological typology and the mechanisms of linguistic diversification. 

References

References

1. Bopp, F. (1816). Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache. Frankfurt.

2. Brugmann, K. (1886). Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der

indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg.

3. Meillet, A. (1937). Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-

européennes. Paris.

4. Fortson, B. (2010). Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction.

Blackwell.

5. Ringe, D. (2017). From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford

University Press.

6. Haspelmath, M. (2011). “The indeterminacy of word segmentation.” Linguistic

Typology, 15(3), 535–572.

7. Plank, F. (2019). Morphological Typology and Language Change. De Gruyter.

8. Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. University of

Chicago Press.

9. Beekes, R. (2011). Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. John

Benjamins.

10. Lehmann, W. P. (1993). Theoretical Bases of Indo-European Linguistics.

Routledge.

11. Baldi, P. (2002). An Introduction to the Indo-European Languages. Southern

Illinois University Press.

12. Hock, H. H., & Joseph, B. D. (2009). Language History, Language Change, and

Language Relationship. Mouton de Gruyter.

13. Kortlandt, F. (2018). Baltic and Slavic Morphological Structures in Historical

Perspective. Leiden University Press.

Published

2025-10-12

How to Cite

Gulmira Usmonova, Madina Abjaparova, & Ruxshona Valiyeva. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES IN INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES . TADQIQOTLAR, 72(1), 60-64. https://journalss.org/index.php/tad/article/view/2348