META, GOOGLE, TIKTOK VA UNUTILISH HUQUQI: XUSUSIY KORPORATSIYALAR SHAXS DAXLSIZLIGINING KALITIMI?

Authors

  • Saparbayeva Maftuna Ikrom qizi Author

Keywords:

Keywords: right to be forgotten, personal data, platform governance, indexation, content moderation, digital footprint, cross-border data transfer

Abstract

  This article analyzes the relationship between the circulation of personal data on 
Meta, Google, and TikTok platforms and the practical enforcement of the right to be 
forgotten.  The  study  draws  on  normative-legal  and  comparative  approaches.  The 
findings  demonstrate  that  platform  design,  indexation  mechanisms,  and  content 
replication significantly constrain the effective realization of the right to erasure. The 
scientific contribution lies in clarifying the criteria for corporate governance in the 
context of personal data protection. 

References

FOYDALANILGAN ADABIYOTLAR RO‘YXATI

1. O’zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi, 01.05.2023y

2. Bygrave L. A. Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 2014.

3. Kuner C. Transborder Data Flows and Data Privacy Law. Oxford: Oxford University

Press, 2013.

4. Копылов В. А. Информационное право. Москва: Юрайт, 2019.

5. Gillespie T. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the

Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven-2018

6. Полякова Т. А. Правовое регулирование персональных данных: проблемы

теории и практики. Москва: Норма, 2018.

7. De Hert P., Papakonstantinou V. The Right to Data Protection and the Right to

Privacy in the EU: A Comparative Analysis. Brussels: Bruylant, 2016.

8. Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the

New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.

9. Gorwa R., Binns R., Katzenbach C. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and

political challenges in the automation of platform governance -2020

10. Wachter S., Mittelstadt B. A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data

Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI -2019

11. Laux J., Wachter S., Mittelstadt B. Taming the few: Platform regulation,

independent audits, and the risks of capture created by the DMA and DSA -2021

12. Esposito C., Horne R., Robaldo L., Buelens B., Goesaert E. Assessing the Solid

Protocol in Relation to Security and Privacy Obligations -2023

13. Diakopoulos N. Accountability in algorithmic decision making -2016

14. Худайберганов А. А. Шахсий маълумотларни ҳуқуқий муҳофаза қилиш

масалалари. Тошкент: TDYU нашриёти, 2020.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Saparbayeva Maftuna Ikrom qizi. (2026). META, GOOGLE, TIKTOK VA UNUTILISH HUQUQI: XUSUSIY KORPORATSIYALAR SHAXS DAXLSIZLIGINING KALITIMI? . TADQIQOTLAR, 85(2), 159-168. https://journalss.org/index.php/tad/article/view/27410