SOCIOLINGUISTIC PROFILE RESERCH PAPER: COMPUTER PROGRAMMING STUDENTS AT TASHKENT PEDAGOGICAL TECHNICAL.

Authors

  • Kdirbayeva Sevara Berdimuratovna Author

Keywords:

Keywords: sociolinguistics · English for Specific Purposes · language ideology · Global Englishes · translanguaging · raciolinguistic ideologies · EFL · Uzbekistan

Abstract

Annotation: This paper presents a sociolinguistic profile of Group 102, a class 
of 14 first-year Computer Programming students at Tashkent Pedagogical Technical  
(TPT)  in  Uzbekistan.  The  profile  examines  learner  backgrounds  across  three 
dimensions — regional origin, gender, and ethnic and linguistic identity — and situates 
these within the multilingual context of Tashkent and the English-using futures for 
which students are being prepared. Drawing on frameworks from World Englishes, 
Global  Englishes,  raciolinguistic  theory,  standard  language  ideology,  and 
translanguaging,  the  paper  identifies  two  overlapping  subgroups  whose  differential 
access  to  English  creates  meaningful  instructional  challenges.  Pedagogical 
implications address differentiated instruction, the strategic use of translanguaging, and 
the disruption of standard language ideologies that disadvantage regional, multilingual, 
and female learners. Assessment implications focus on analytic rubric design, the risks 
of  raciolinguistic  bias  in  evaluation,  and  advocacy  for  contextually  appropriate 
assessment in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) settings. 

References

References

1. Bayley, R., & Villarreal, D. (2018). Cultural attitudes toward language variation

and dialects. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language

teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

2. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic

approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.

3. Calder, T. (2020). Language and gender. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.),

The handbook of language variation and change. Wiley Blackwell.

4. Fought, C. (2011). Language and ethnicity. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), The Cambridge

handbook of sociolinguistics(pp. 238–257). Cambridge University Press.

5. Kachru, B. B. (1990). World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes,

9(1), 3–20.

6. Lippi-Green, R. (2004). Language ideology and language prejudice. In E. Finegan

& J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the twenty-first

century(pp. 289–304). Cambridge University Press.

7. Rosa, J., & Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a

raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647.

8. Selvi, A. F. (2019). Incorporating Global Englishes in K–12 classrooms. In L. C.

de Oliveira (Ed.), The handbook of TESOL in K–12(pp. 83–99). John Wiley &

Sons.

9. Tirvassen, R. (2018). Sociolinguistics and the narrative turn: Researching

language and society in contexts of change and transition. BRILL.

10. Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2014). An introduction to sociolinguistics(7th ed.).

John Wiley & Sons.

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Kdirbayeva Sevara Berdimuratovna. (2026). SOCIOLINGUISTIC PROFILE RESERCH PAPER: COMPUTER PROGRAMMING STUDENTS AT TASHKENT PEDAGOGICAL TECHNICAL . TADQIQOTLAR, 86(5), 330-338. https://journalss.org/index.php/tad/article/view/30707