THE ROLE OF INTERACTIVE TEACHING METHODS IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN ENGLISH CLASSROOMS
Keywords:
Keywords: interactive teaching, student motivation, EFL classroom, collaborative learning, gamification, project-based learning, technology integration, intrinsic motivation, language anxiety, learner autonomy.Abstract
Abstract
Interactive teaching methods have emerged as powerful tools for enhancing
student motivation in English language classrooms. This article examines how
collaborative learning, gamification, project-based learning, and technology-integrated
instruction contribute to increased engagement and intrinsic motivation among EFL
learners. Drawing on key motivational theories — including Self-Determination
Theory and the L2 Motivational Self System — the study synthesizes theoretical
frameworks and empirical evidence to demonstrate that active, student-centered
approaches foster positive attitudes toward English learning. The findings indicate that
interactive methods support learner autonomy, reduce language anxiety, and cultivate
a sense of community in the classroom. Pedagogical recommendations are provided
for educators seeking to design motivating, participatory learning environments.
References
References (APA)
1. Boss, S., & Larmer, J. (2018). Project Based Teaching: How to Create Rigorous
and Engaging Learning Experiences. ASCD.
2. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design
elements to gamefulness: Defining ‘gamification’. Proceedings of the 15th
International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15.
3. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge
University Press.
4. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda
(Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual
Matters.
5. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The
Role of Attitudes and Motivation. Edward Arnold.
6. Han, J. (2017). Project-based learning in EFL classrooms: Effects on motivation
and language proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 19(4), 112–138.
7. Healey, D. (2018). Technology enhanced learning environments. In J. I. Liontas
(Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Wiley.
8. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom
anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
9. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone:
Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
10. Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results.
Education Sciences, 9(2), 90.
11. Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Collaborative learning and EFL motivation: A mixed-
methods study. Language Teaching Research, 24(3), 344–367.
12. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,
55(1), 68–78.
13. Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A
systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206.
14. Tsai, Y. R. (2019). Promotion of learner autonomy within a collaborative learning
framework. RELC Journal, 50(1), 144–163.
15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher
Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
