THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORMS ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AMONG ENGLISH LEARNERS

Authors

  • Khudoyorova Gulasal Ilhomiddinovna Author

Keywords:

KEY WORDS: autonomous learning, online platforms, practical language, language proficiency, cross-cultural communication, international collaboration

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The article explores the importance and effects of online learning 
platforms,  such  as  Speak  pall,  Duolingo,  Ibrat  Academy  and  others  for  language 
proficiency. The article also includes information about the countries that are using 
different apps and results. Additionally, study shows that I taught many students in my 
village where the opportunities were limited and how they were able to develop their 
communication skills using modern apps, talking with their peers all over the world. 
The research employed a combination of surveys, classroom observations, interviews, 
and speaking tests to evaluate learners’ progress and preferences. The results indicate 
that platforms emphasizing real-time communication and interactive practice were the 
most effective in developing speaking fluency, pronunciation, and confidence. The 
findings suggest that online learning applications can serve as vital tools in modern 
English education, especially for learners with restricted access to traditional classroom 
instruction, by providing opportunities for autonomous learning, global interaction, 
and practical language use. 

References

REFERENCES:

1. Annan, K. (2001). We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st

Century. United Nations Publications.

2. British Council. (2020). English in the World: A Study of Global Language Trends.

London: British Council.

3. Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and Mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

4. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University

Press.

5. Dooly, M., & O’Dowd, R. (2012). Researching Online Foreign Language

Interaction and Exchange. Peter Lang Publishing.

6. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). “Mobile-Assisted Language Learning.” Language

Learning & Technology, 22(3), 2–11.

7. Hockly, N. (2015). Digital Literacies and Language Learning. Oxford University

Press.

8. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.

9. Mandela, N. (1994). Long Walk to Freedom. Little, Brown and Company.

10. Munday, P. (2016). “Using Duolingo in Language Learning.” RIED: Revista

Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1), 83–101.

11. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language

Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

12. Stockwell, G. (2016). Mobile Language Learning: Innovation and Inspiration.

Routledge.

13. Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). “Principles for Mobile-Assisted Language

Learning.” TIRF Report.

14. Thorne, S. L. (2010). “The ‘Intercultural Turn’ and Online Language Use.”

Language Teaching, 43(3), 296–306.

15. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-Based Language Teaching:

Concepts and Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2026-01-16

How to Cite

Khudoyorova Gulasal Ilhomiddinovna. (2026). THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORMS ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AMONG ENGLISH LEARNERS . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 61(2), 34-42. https://journalss.org/index.php/tal/article/view/15165