ELLIPSIS IN MODERN ENGLISH: THEORETICAL, STRUCTURAL AND PRAGMATIC CHALLENGES IN THE LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF ELLIPTICAL SENTENCES

Authors

  • Jurayeva Hilola Kamol qizi Author
  • Eshonkulov Ravshan Tokhirovich Author

Keywords:

Keywords: ellipsis, elliptical sentences, syntactic deletion, pragmatic inference, discourse analysis, Modern English, linguistic analysis

Abstract

 
Abstract.  Ellipsis  constitutes  one  of  the  most  theoretically  challenging  and 
empirically diverse phenomena in Modern English syntax and discourse. Although 
widely acknowledged as a mechanism of linguistic economy, elliptical constructions 
raise  persistent  analytical  problems  concerning  structural  representation,  semantic 
recoverability, pragmatic inference, and processing constraints. This study investigates 
the principal difficulties in the linguistic analysis of elliptical sentences in Modern 
English from syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic perspectives. Drawing upon a mixed 
qualitative and corpus-based methodology, the research analyses examples from the 
British  National  Corpus,  contemporary  newspapers,  literary  prose,  and  spoken 
discourse.  The  findings  demonstrate  that  ellipsis  cannot  be  adequately  explained 
through a single theoretical model: generative accounts emphasize structural deletion, 
while functional and discourse approaches foreground contextual recoverability and 
communicative  economy.  The  study  identifies  key  analytical  challenges,  including 
ambiguous antecedent recovery, structural indeterminacy, genre-based variation, and 
computational  parsing  limitations.  The  discussion  evaluates  competing  theoretical 
interpretations and considers implications for translation, foreign language pedagogy, 
and  natural  language  processing.  The  paper  argues  for  an  integrative  model  that 
combines structural representation with pragmatic inferencing to account for elliptical 
phenomena in Modern English. 

References

References

1. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

2. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

3. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),

Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

4. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.).

London: Edward Arnold.

5. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

6. Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of

ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7. Merchant, J. (2019). Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In M. Everaert &

H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax (2nd ed.).

Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

8. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive

grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

9. Sag, I. A., & Hankamer, J. (1984). Toward a theory of anaphoric processing.

Linguistics and Philosophy, 7(3), 325–345.

10. Sells, P. (1987). Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 445–479.

11. Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 101–139.

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Jurayeva Hilola Kamol qizi, & Eshonkulov Ravshan Tokhirovich. (2026). ELLIPSIS IN MODERN ENGLISH: THEORETICAL, STRUCTURAL AND PRAGMATIC CHALLENGES IN THE LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF ELLIPTICAL SENTENCES . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 64(1), 131-137. https://journalss.org/index.php/tal/article/view/20558