COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CASE SYSTEMS IN UZBEK AND GERMAN LANGUAGES
Abstract
Introduction
In the language system, grammatical categories are among the main tools that
regulate speech. One of the most important of these categories is the case category,
which determines the grammatical functions of nouns in a sentence and their
relationships with other words. Through cases, syntactic-semantic relations such as
subject, object, possession, direction, and others are expressed. Therefore, the case
system plays an important role in understanding the grammatical structure of any
language. Uzbek and German belong to different typological groups: Uzbek is an
agglutinative language, while German belongs to the inflectional (fusional) language
type. This difference is clearly reflected in the expression of case. In Uzbek, cases are
mainly formed by attaching suffixes to nouns, whereas in German they are expressed
through changes in articles, nouns, and pronouns. Despite these differences, in both
language systems the primary function of case is to clarify grammatical relations within
the sentence structure. In modern comparative linguistics, comparing structurally
different languages makes it possible to identify their common and distinctive features.
A comparative study of the case systems in Uzbek and German is particularly
important both theoretically and practically for Uzbek-speaking learners of German.
Therefore, this research aims to analyze the grammatical and functional aspects of the
case category based on the two languages. The case category is not only morphological
and syntactic but also a semantically and typologically significant part of the language
system. Modern comparative linguistic studies show that although cases are expressed
differently across languages, their primary function is to clarify the relationships
between subject and object and to make sentence meaning clear. In Uzbek, cases are
formed through an agglutinative mechanism and, together with relatively free word
order, ensure semantic clarity. In German, cases interact with articles and noun forms
and are connected with gender and number, which increases morphological
complexity. These aspects provide an important basis for comparative and typological
analysis and help develop effective approaches for Uzbek speakers learning German.
References
References:
1. Helbig, G., & Buscha, J. Deutsche Grammatik. Leipzig: Langenscheidt.
2. Dudenredaktion. Duden – Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
3. Comrie, B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford:
Blackwell.
4. Abdurahmonov, G‘., & Hojiyev, A. Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili grammatikasi.
Toshkent.
5. Yusupov, O. Qiyosiy tilshunoslik asoslari. Toshkent: Fan.
6. Haspelmath, M. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.
7. Payne, T. E. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists.
Cambridge: CUP.
8. Croft, W. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.
9. Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. Inflectional Morphology.
Cambridge: CUP.
10.Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.