OG‘ZAKI AKADEMIK DISKURSDA HEDGING VA BOOSTING VOSITALARINING QIYOSIY TAHLILI
Keywords:
Kalit so‘zlar: og‘zaki diskurs, hedging, boosting, akademik nutq, metadiskurs, pragmatikaAbstract
Annotatsiya (o‘zbek tilida)
Mazkur tezis og‘zaki akademik diskursda hedging (noaniqlikni ifodalovchi) va
boosting (ishonchlilikni kuchaytiruvchi) lingvistik vositalarning qo‘llanilishini qiyosiy
tahlil qilishga bag‘ishlangan. Tadqiqotda ushbu vositalarning turlari, funksional
xususiyatlari va og‘zaki nutqdagi pragmatik vazifalari o‘rganildi. Natijalarga ko‘ra,
hedging vositalari og‘zaki nutqda muloqotning yumshoqligi, ehtiyotkorligi va
interaktivligini ta’minlasa, boosting vositalari fikrni qat’iylashtirish va auditoriyani
ishontirishda muhim rol o‘ynaydi. Tadqiqot akademik og‘zaki nutqni o‘qitish va
rivojlantirishda amaliy ahamiyatga ega.
References
FOYDALANILGAN ADABIYOTLAR
1. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
2. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London:
Continuum.
3. Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy
concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458–508.
4. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in
medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–
170.
