COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTHROPOMORPHIZED ANIMAL CHARACTERS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK ANIMATION

Authors

  • Jumaniyozova Sarvinoz Rasulbekovna Author
  • Atkamova Sumanbar Askarovna Author

Keywords:

Key terms: anthropomorphism, animation, language teaching, semiotics, cultural semiotics, comparing different media, teaching-related discourse

Abstract

     Abstract This article offers a structured side-by-side look at how human-like animal characters are used in English and Uzbek animated films, using a language-teaching and semiotics perspective. Instead of simply describing what’s on screen, it sets out clear criteria—what the characters’ speech is used for, how independently they act, how much symbolic meaning they carry, and how closely they match the story’s moral message—to see how anthropomorphism works both for storytelling and for teaching. Building on systemic-functional linguistics (Halliday) and cultural semiotics (Lotman), the study reviews six well-known animated works from each tradition. The results suggest that English animation tends to use anthropomorphism to show problem-solving and emotional intelligence, while Uzbek animation uses it more as a tool for moral lessons and for strengthening a shared group identity. The article also considers how these findings could be used in language classes and in teaching cross-cultural media literacy.

References

1) Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press.

2) Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press.

3) Geerdts, M. S., Van de Walle, G. A., & LoBue, V. (2016). Learning about real animals from anthropomorphic media. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 95–109.

4) Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. Edward Arnold.

5) Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage.

6) Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences (2nd ed.). Sage.

7) Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.

8) Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

9) Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. I.B. Tauris.

10) Wells, P. (2009). The Animated Bestiary: Animals, Cartoons, and Culture. Rutgers University Press.

Published

2026-05-16

How to Cite

Jumaniyozova Sarvinoz Rasulbekovna, & Atkamova Sumanbar Askarovna. (2026). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTHROPOMORPHIZED ANIMAL CHARACTERS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK ANIMATION. Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 69(2), 103-106. https://journalss.org/index.php/tal/article/view/30139