BORROWING WORDS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH: A CONTRASTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Abdusadikova Dilfuza Abduvayit qizi, Author
  • Radjabov Nasir Nasimovich Author

Keywords:

Key words: foreign words, lexical stratification, donor language, phonetic change, language prestige, terminology, lexical enrichment, language history.

Abstract

Abstract. This article explores the process by which foreign words penetrate 
and become established within the lexical systems of Uzbek and English, tracing the 
degree to which such words are structurally assimilated and identifying the conditions 
that determine whether a borrowed item achieves full integration or remains marked 
as external. Rather than cataloguing loanwords by origin, the study focuses on the 
dynamic relationship between external linguistic pressure and the internal structural 
resistance of each receiving language. The article argues that the degree and character 
of  lexical  assimilation  is  shaped  not  only  by  phonological  and  morphological 
compatibility but equally by the social prestige attached to the donor language, the 
institutional context of contact, and the communicative domains in which borrowed 
words first circulate. Findings from both languages reveal that the boundary between 
native  and  borrowed  vocabulary  is  far  less  stable  than  traditional  lexicological 
classifications suggest. 

References

References

1. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Henry Holt and Company.

2. Jespersen, O. (1982). Growth and Structure of the English Language (10th ed.).

University of Chicago Press.

3. Matras, Y. (2020). Language Contact (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

4. Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge

University Press.

5. Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and

Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford University Press.

6. Rahmatullayev, Sh. (1978). O'zbek tilining izohli frazeologik lug'ati. O'qituvchi.

7. Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

8. Trudgill, P. (2011). Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic

Complexity. Oxford University Press.

9. Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B.

B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language Ideologies:

Practice and Theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford University Press.

10. Yo'ldoshev, M. (2008). Badiiy matn va uning lingvopoetik tahlili. Fan nashriyoti.

Published

2026-05-17

How to Cite

Abdusadikova Dilfuza Abduvayit qizi, & Radjabov Nasir Nasimovich. (2026). BORROWING WORDS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH: A CONTRASTIVE STUDY . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 69(2), 168-173. https://journalss.org/index.php/tal/article/view/30194