SUNʼIY INTELLEKTNI HUQUQIY SHAXS SIFATIDA TAN OLISH: KORPORATIV JAVOBGARLIK MODELIDAN OʻRGANISH IMKONIYATLARI
Keywords:
Kalit soʻzlar: huquqiy shaxs, sunʼiy intellekt, elektron shaxs, korporativ javobgarlik, yuridik shaxs, funksional maqom, masʼul ijro, cheklangan subyektlik.Abstract
Annotatsiya. Maqolada sunʼiy intellekt (SI) tizimlariga huquqiy shaxs maqomi
berish imkoniyati korporativ javobgarlik modeli bilan qiyosiy tahlil asosida koʻrib
chiqiladi. Muallif avvalo huquqiy shaxs tushunchasining falsafiy-huquqiy asoslarini
yoritib, yuridik shaxs institutining tarixiy shakllanishini tahlil qiladi. Soʻngra
“elektron shaxs” (electronic personhood) konsepsiyasining mazmuni, Yevropa
Parlamenti muhokamasi va unga qaratilgan asosiy eʻtirozlar koʻrib chiqiladi.
Korporativ javobgarlik modelining SI uchun qoʻllaniladigan va qoʻllaniladigan
jihatlari aniqlashtiriladi. Xulosa sifatida SI uchun toʻliq subyektlik emas, balki
cheklangan funksional maqom modelini joriy etish taklif etiladi.
References
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar
1. Solaiman S. M. Legal Personality of Robots, Corporations, Idols and
Chimpanzees: A Quest for Legitimacy // Artificial Intelligence and Law. – 2017. – Vol.
25, No. 2. – P. 155–179.
2. Floridi L. et al. An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities,
Risks, Principles, and Recommendations // Minds and Machines. – 2018. – Vol. 28,
No. 4. – P. 689–707.
3. Shyam Balganesh. Unplanned Obsolescence: Teaching and Learning from the
Copyright Act of 1909 // Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. – 2014. – Vol. 28.
4. Chopra S., White L. F. A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents. – Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011. – 220 p.
5. Danaher J. Robots, Law and the Retribution Gap // Ethics and Information
Technology. – 2016. – Vol. 18, No. 4. – P. 299–309.
6. Hallevy G. When Robots Kill: Artificial Intelligence under Criminal Law. –
Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2013. – 264 p.
7. European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2017 with Recommendations to
the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). – Brussels, 2017.
8. Open Letter to the European Commission: Artificial Intelligence and Robotics /
Signed by 156 AI, robotics and ethics experts. – 2018.
9. Asaro P. M. The Liability Problem for Autonomous Artificial Agents // AAAI
Spring Symposium Series: Ethical and Moral Considerations in Non-Human Agents.
– 2016. – P. 190–194.
10. Abbott R. The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. –
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. – 312 p.
11. Bainbridge W. Electronic Personhood: The Legal Status of Artificial
Agents // Computer Law Review International. – 2019. – Vol. 20, No. 3. – P. 73–81.
12. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik kodeksi. – Toshkent: Adolat, 2024.
13. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi. – Toshkent: Adolat, 2024.
14. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Sunʼiy intellekt
texnologiyalarini rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi qarori. – Toshkent, 2024.
