STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING THE RECOVERY TIME OF SEMICONDUCTOR METAL-OXIDE GAS SENSORS

Authors

  • Aliyev Kh.F. Author

Keywords:

Keywords: metal-oxide semiconductor; gas sensor; recovery time; desorption energy; gas diffusion; catalytic spillover; light activation; temperature modulation.

Abstract

 
Abstract. The recovery time is, together with sensitivity and selectivity, one of 
the decisive figures of merit of semiconductor metal-oxide (SMOx) chemiresistors, yet 
it is frequently the slowest and least optimised parameter. A long recovery limits the 
duty cycle, prevents continuous real-time monitoring and increases the energy budget 
of a sensor node. This paper analyses the physical origin of the recovery transient and 
reviews, within a single quantitative framework, the strategies available to shorten it. 
We  model  the  recovery  as  a  desorption-limited  first-order  relaxation  whose  time 
constant  follows  an  Arrhenius  law;  from  a  linearised  representation  an  effective 
desorption energy of about 0.62 eV is obtained. We then treat the diffusion-limited 
regime  in  porous  layers,  identify  the  cross-over  between  reaction-  and  diffusion-
control, and quantify how operating temperature, noble-metal loading, heterojunction 
formation, grain-size reduction, light activation and thermal modulation each act on 
these  two  limiting  times.  The  contributions  are  summarised  and  design  rules  are 
proposed for sub-second recovery without sacrificing sensitivity. 

References

References

1. Dutta T., Noushin T., Tabassum S., Mishra S.K. Road map of semiconductor metal-

oxide-based sensors: A review. Sensors, 2023, vol. 23, no. 15, 6849.

2. Goel N., Kunal K., Kushwaha A., Kumar M. Metal oxide semiconductors for gas

sensing. Engineering Reports, 2023, vol. 5, no. 6, e12604.

3. Liu X., Cheng S., Liu H., Hu S., Zhang D., Ning H. A survey on gas sensing

technology. Sensors, 2012, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 9635–9665.

4. Barsan N., Weimar U. Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors. Journal of

Electroceramics, 2001, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 143–167.

5. Yamazoe N., Sakai G., Shimanoe K. Oxide semiconductor gas sensors. Catalysis

Surveys from Asia, 2003, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–75.

6. Wang X., Wang Y., Tian F., et al. From the surface reaction control to gas-diffusion

control: the synthesis of hierarchical porous SnO₂ microspheres and their gas-

sensing mechanism. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, vol. 119, no. 27, pp.

15963–15976.

7. Sakai G., Matsunaga N., Shimanoe K., Yamazoe N. Theory of gas-diffusion

controlled sensitivity for thin film semiconductor gas sensor. Sensors and Actuators

B, 2001, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 125–131.

8. Kolmakov A., Klenov D., Lilach Y., Stemmer S., Moskovits M. Enhanced gas

sensing by individual SnO₂ nanowires and nanobelts functionalized with Pd catalyst

particles. Nano Letters, 2005, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 667–673.

9. Degler D., Weimar U., Barsan N. Current understanding of the fundamental

mechanisms of doped and loaded semiconducting metal-oxide-based gas sensing

materials. ACS Sensors, 2019, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 2228–2249.

10. Korotcenkov G. The role of morphology and crystallographic structure of metal

oxides in response of conductometric-type gas sensors. Materials Science and

Engineering: R, 2008, vol. 61, no. 1–6, pp. 1–39.

11. Xu C., Tamaki J., Miura N., Yamazoe N. Grain size effects on gas sensitivity of

porous SnO₂-based elements. Sensors and Actuators B, 1991, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 147–

155.

12. Comini E., Cristalli A., Faglia G., Sberveglieri G. Light enhanced gas sensing

properties of indium oxide and tin dioxide sensors. Sensors and Actuators B, 2000,

vol. 65, no. 1–3, pp. 260–263.

13. Chinh N.D., Quang N.D., Lee H., et al. NO gas sensing kinetics at room

temperature under UV light irradiation of In₂O₃ nanostructures. Scientific Reports,

2016, vol. 6, 35066.

14. Lee A.P., Reedy B.J. Temperature modulation in semiconductor gas sensing.

Sensors and Actuators B, 1999, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 35–42.

15. Majhi S.M., Mirzaei A., Kim H.W., Kim S.S., Kim T.W. Recent advances in

energy-saving chemiresistive gas sensors: A review. Nano Energy, 2021, vol. 79,

105369.

16. Tiemann M. Porous metal oxides as gas sensors. Chemistry – A European Journal,

2007, vol. 13, no. 30, pp. 8376–8388.

17. Barsan N., Weimar U. Understanding the fundamental principles of metal oxide

based gas sensors; the example of CO sensing with SnO₂ sensors in the presence of

humidity. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2003, vol. 15, no. 20, R813.

18. Ji H., Zeng W., Li Y. Gas sensing mechanisms of metal oxide semiconductors: A

focus review. Nanoscale, 2019, vol. 11, no. 47, pp. 22664–22684.

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Aliyev Kh.F. (2026). STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING THE RECOVERY TIME OF SEMICONDUCTOR METAL-OXIDE GAS SENSORS . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 71(1), 168-175. https://journalss.org/index.php/tal/article/view/33704